Spineless Laugh

  • Archive
  • RSS
  • Ask me anything

Once upon a time a rich man named Romney ran for president. He could claim, with considerable justice, that his wealth was well-earned, that he had in fact done a lot to create good jobs for American workers. Nonetheless, the public understandably wanted to know both how he had grown so rich and what he had done with his wealth; he obliged by releasing extensive information about his financial history.

But that was 44 years ago. And the contrast between George Romney and his son Mitt — a contrast both in their business careers and in their willingness to come clean about their financial affairs — dramatically illustrates how America has changed.

…What did George Romney do for a living? The answer was straightforward: he ran an auto company, American Motors. And he ran it very well indeed: at a time when the Big Three were still fixated on big cars and ignoring the rising tide of imports, Romney shifted to a highly successful focus on compacts that restored the company’s fortunes, not to mention that it saved the jobs of many American workers.

It also made him personally rich. We know this because during his run for president, he released not one, not two, but 12 years’ worth of tax returns, explaining that any one year might just be a fluke. From those returns we learn that in his best year, 1960, he made more than $660,000 — the equivalent, adjusted for inflation, of around $5 million today.

Those returns also reveal that he paid a lot of taxes — 36 percent of his income in 1960, 37 percent over the whole period. This was in part because, as one report at the time put it, he “seldom took advantage of loopholes to escape his tax obligations.” But it was also because taxes on the rich were much higher in the ’50s and ’60s than they are now. In fact, once you include the indirect effects of taxes on corporate profits, taxes on the very rich were about twice current levels.

Now fast-forward to Romney the Younger, who made even more money during his business career at Bain Capital. Unlike his father, however, Mr. Romney didn’t get rich by producing things people wanted to buy; he made his fortune through financial engineering that seems in many cases to have left workers worse off, and in some cases driven companies into bankruptcy.

And there’s another contrast: George Romney was open and forthcoming about what he did with his wealth, but Mitt Romney has largely kept his finances secret. He did, grudgingly, release one year’s tax return plus an estimate for the next year, showing that he paid a startlingly low tax rate. But as the Vanity Fair report points out, we’re still very much in the dark about his investments, some of which seem very mysterious.

Put it this way: Has there ever before been a major presidential candidate who had a multimillion-dollar Swiss bank account, plus tens of millions invested in the Cayman Islands, famed as a tax haven?

PAUL KRUGMAN, “Mitt’s Gray Areas,” in the New York Times (via inothernews)
    • #mitt romney
    • #republicans
    • #gop
    • #politics
    • #2012
    • #the rich
    • #news
  • 10 months ago > inothernews
  • 370
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

arielnietzsche:

Raising Taxes on The Rich Doesn’t Hurt Growth

In an interview with WSJ’s Jon Hilsenrath, MIT professor Simon Johnson calls for higher income-tax rates as part of a “fiscally conservative” plan to shore up the U.S. budget in the long run. “We have lost track of the fact that deficits do in fact matter…,” he says.

Raising rates on the rich will not hurt economic growth.  That’s a lie.  

Two brilliant economists – Peter Diamond and Emmanuel Saez – write that we need to raise rates on the rich – the WSJ has the story:

According to our analysis of current tax rates and their elasticity, the revenue-maximizing top federal marginal income tax rate would be in or near the range of 50%-70% (taking into account that individuals face additional taxes from Medicare and state and local taxes). Thus we conclude that raising the top tax rate is very likely to result in revenue increases at least until we reach the 50% rate that held during the first Reagan administration, and possibly until the 70% rate of the 1970s. To reduce tax avoidance opportunities, tax rates on capital gains and dividends should increase along with the basic rate. Closing loopholes and stepping up enforcement would further limit tax avoidance and evasion.

But will raising top tax rates significantly lower economic growth? In the postwar U.S., higher top tax rates tend to go with higher economic growth—not lower. Indeed, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Economic Analysis, GDP annual growth per capita (to adjust for population growth) averaged 1.68% between 1980 and 2010 when top tax rates were relatively low, while growth averaged 2.23% between 1950 and 1980 when top tax rates were at or above 70%.

This chart shows a correlation between the cutting of the top marginal rates on the rich with an explosion of the deficit:

And even though you often hear the canard that America is a high tax country – that’s ridiculous.  Looking at EFFECTIVE rates (or your taxes minus deductions of which there are MANY) – the U.S. actually enjoys low tax rates:

Source: Economist

(via stfuconservatives)

Source: classwarfareexists.com

    • #jobs
    • #growth
    • #economy
    • #taxes
    • #the rich
  • 1 year ago > prosveshcheniye
  • 114
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
stfuconservatives:

think-progress:

Clinton’s Labor Secretary schools Romney on how economics work.

Economics burn! Interestingly enough, that dude’s got a tumblr.
-Joe
View Separately

stfuconservatives:

think-progress:

Clinton’s Labor Secretary schools Romney on how economics work.

Economics burn! Interestingly enough, that dude’s got a tumblr.

-Joe

(via stfuconservatives)

Source: thinkprogress.org

    • #4%
    • #Robert Reich
    • #Romney
    • #Unemployment
    • #Hi Robert!
    • #economics
    • #education
    • #infrastructure
    • #taxes
    • #the rich
  • 1 year ago > think-progress
  • 2119
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

About

Hate is the waste product of love.


Denmark. Male. Mid-20's.


I'm pretty emotionally fucked up.
  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Ask me anything
  • Mobile
Effector Theme by Pixel Union